A shocking case of fraud has emerged in relation to Hunter Biden’s plea deal for misdemeanor tax charges. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith filed a motion to invalidate the plea deal, arguing that preferential sentencing was given to the President’s son. However, it was discovered that a woman working for one of Hunter Biden’s attorneys pretended to be Smith’s lawyer and attempted to remove the request from the court’s docket. The judge has called for an explanation from the attorney, and the incident has raised concerns about the fairness and integrity of the federal justice system. This brazen act of obstruction and fraud highlights the perception that some individuals believe they can manipulate the legal process due to their connections.
The case of Hunter Biden, son of President Biden, has taken a startling turn with the revelation of an attempt to commit fraud to protect him from facing the full consequences of his actions. Hunter Biden faced two tax evasion charges amounting to $100,000 in unpaid taxes, each carrying a potential prison sentence of up to 12 months. However, instead of facing the two-year imprisonment that many ordinary Americans would expect for such a crime, he received a lenient plea deal, raising eyebrows and questions about preferential treatment.
In response to the perceived injustice, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith took action and sought to have Hunter Biden’s plea deal for tax evasion reviewed and invalidated. Smith believed that the President’s son received favorable sentencing treatment due to his powerful connections, a scenario all too familiar in some Third World nations.
The plot thickens as evidence of an audacious attempt at obstruction emerges. It came to light that a woman, an employee of Hunter Biden’s attorney Chris Clark, impersonated Jason Smith’s lawyer, Theodore Kittila, in a call to Delaware clerk Sam Grimes. This woman asked the court to remove Smith’s request for the review of the plea deal, effectively trying to bury any scrutiny of Hunter Biden’s lenient sentence.
The discovery of this fraudulent act raised alarms among those involved in the case. (glonme.com) Judge Maryellen Noreika, upon learning of the impersonation, expressed her displeasure and issued an order demanding an explanation from Chris Clark or face potential sanctions. The attempt to obstruct justice in a high-profile case like this is a serious offense and has brought the integrity of the federal justice system into question. (rare.us)
Chris Clark attempted to deflect the accusation, feigning ignorance about the incident and claiming that the clerk removed the filing independently. (glonme.com) (glonme.com) However, court clerks are well aware of the importance of documenting all interactions and are not known for randomly removing court business without due cause.
The clerk, Theodore Kittila, provided a clear account of the fraudulent attempt, confirming that the woman who called identified herself as Jessica Bengels, a member of Hunter Biden’s legal team, and even provided her phone number. She falsely claimed to work with Kittila and insisted on the document’s immediate removal.
The audacity of such an attempt suggests a belief among Hunter Biden’s lawyers that they could manipulate the federal justice system to their advantage. This blatant act of fraud and obstruction has left many wondering about the fairness and impartiality of the legal system when influential individuals are involved.
As politically mature individuals from the USA, it is vital for us to reflect on this shocking incident and consider its implications. What are your thoughts on this case and the perception of preferential treatment for those in power? (glonme.com) Share your reflections and opinions in the comments below. Let us engage in a thoughtful discussion about the importance of upholding the principles of justice and accountability in our society.
